Wednesday, 25 January 2012

Passwords and Children

A recent post on Boing Boing regarding teenagers sharing passwords with friends and significant other has raised some questions with me - mostly based around my daughter and the world she will grow up in.

Now I regard myself as someone who at least is aware of most of the technology and the advances that it offers to our lives - I advocate for the use of new tech at work and I am always looking at ways to improve what we do. I love the fact that for Christmas using a Smart Phone, Skype and WiFi Daughter was able to show Nanny all her new presents and talk to Nanny's face... this is now simple tech - available to everyone with a broadband connection and a few cheap devices.

But what about the future? What will my daughter grow up with and what will count as 'normal' or 'expected' in her life. Maybe it is my recent read of 1984 that has raised this, but what will be safe for her? I read alot about internet security and identity safety - do the current generation of young adult really understand that what is on Social Media sites is owned by the site? So they realise that Big Brother (the corporate world) is watching everything they do and say. Targeted Marketing is nothing new but so much more powerful with the use of Social Media and information data warehouses that are built from them.

Even this humble blog is not safe from it. The Google ads that are on this site are targeted to the posts that I write... If I write about my guitar lessons you see self help guitar ads, or guitar sales. This is what Google does best by the way and not necessarily a bad thing - but when does it become too much and what do we need to do about saving the future so that our children grow up safe...

I boil it down to trust. Like the article quoted in the Boing Boing post parents need to develop ways to create trust with their children... and so should these super corps with their customers and clients... Remember there are always alternatives and sometimes we just have to walk away...
There are different ways that parents address the password issue, but they almost always build on the narrative of trust. - The NYTimes
Another articled linked from Boing Boing details how parents can normalise password sharing. So will we require daughter to share her passwords with us? Not sure... will we want to be 'friends' or part of her social media networks? At this stage Yes! I am part of my nephews and nieces networks and even though I don't interfere I can see what they are doing and sometimes pass on private messages when I think it is appropriate. But will I need to access their private accounts? I don't think so - that is a trust issue and while privately they could be sending messages or doing things - that should remain their business...

My wife and I have separate bank accounts and a joint account for the normal life expenses - we have separate passwords and access to these. I don't have or want her passwords for her Social Media pages and sites and she likewise - the trust we have in each other is formed by that. I don't feel I need to have that part of her. That is her private business - If I need to post something about us or her I have my own accounts to do that.

We will need to be aware of these challenges as Daughter grows up... and I hope we do the right thing by her - but I am prepared to fail at some of it and hit the mark with others... That my friends is LIFE.

The full New York Times article

Sunday, 22 January 2012

Nineteen Eighty-Four - George Orwell

This is the first of my 2012 reader challenges, Literary Fiction - which Wikipedia defines as

The term is principally used to distinguish "serious fiction" which is a work that claims to hold literary merit, in comparison from genre fiction and popular fiction (i.e., paraliterature). In broad terms, literary fiction focuses more upon style, psychological depth, and character. This is in contrast to Mainstream commercial fiction, which focuses more on narrative and plot. Literary fiction may also be characterized as lasting fiction — literature which continues to be read and in-demand many decades and perhaps centuries after the author has died.
Under this definition I chose to read Nineteen Eight-Four by George Orwell... which (surprise to some) I have never read.

I'm not going to compete with the great reviews of this book, I am no Isaac Asimov - instead I am going to focus no how I felt when reading this book and what my life, the media and other influences have affected my reading.

So I assume you have followed the link to Isaac Asimov's review or at least you know some the history to this classic book - quick summary. Following on from Animal Farm 1984 is the continuation of the Soviet theme of a world controlled by 3 super countries, strict controls govern everything and the party is all powerful. Big Brother is always watching...

The thing I had to get over when reading this was that to the audience in 1948 this was all new. This was horrifying and totally unheard of. For me this was a great story a great idea but one I have been introduced to many times before. Brazil is one of my all time favourite movies and yet it borrows so much from Orwell - much I have never even knew about. I knew what Big Brother was (not the TV show) but the idea of the Government watching you. Cory Doctorow's Little Brother again uses this theme (download for free) instead for a younger audience - highly recommend this.

Needless to say 1984 did not cause me to have sleepless nights - unless you count the fact I HAD to force myself to put it down to sleep! The fear did not build inside of me - I am used to the idea of Government complete control... not in the way that I am happy for it - far from it. But the idea is not new.

So the constant reminder that this was so new and different, say to my parents generation, kept me thinking. What if I read this first, before seeing the popular culture references, before film and television... Maybe it would have been harder for me to understand the world - maybe it was a better (easier) experience for me.

I understood the concepts Orwell writes about, the Government control, the fear-control, the restrictions, the small rooms (almost communal living), the telescreen for a wall (some people have them already with the large TV's). This was not at all unfamilar and I was therefore able to slip into the story. Into the world of Winston Smith.

Enough I have written that part to death... on to the book itself.

As afore mentioned I read this fairly quickly, having to stop to eat, sleep and that dreaded work... me thinks if all those other things had less importance it may have been read in one sitting - I think that qualifies that I liked the book.

Orwell's style is very easy, third person but only following Winston and his sad existence within the tight confines of control. Orwell has not just placed his story in a different or potential world, he had created this universe - an alternative reality. The Appendix on "The Principals of Newspeak" is akin to Tolkien's Elvish language (a stretch I know but it has a similar vein). In other words he didn't just plonk the characters into the world they are the world and the world is them...

But this world is our world - or at least the potential world from the view of 1948, and it is the familiar things that makes the difference. The pub on the corner, the artefacts Winston 'finds' and the country side all let the reader know that Airstrip One is England.

The way this modern (for the books release) world is hinted at make 1984 more real and less of a fantasy. I can see that Orwell really wanted to stop the tide of the Socialist and the evil he saw it represent.

Unfortunately in this current world the opposite side is almost making Airstrip One a reality. Big Brother has started to watch us, the media spreads the fear through shows like Today Tonight and A Current Affair. Is text speak Newspeak? Corporations and not Government have much of the control over the world. We might not see it as clearly in Australia as in some other countries - however the way the mining companies are working to create fear over things like the mining tax show that they have some power...

I believe that reading 1984 was a MUST, however I would not change the timing - I think I got more out of it because I knew and understood the world Orwell writes about. I didn't have to waste time getting my head around the concepts. 1984 is a world I want to avoid and I hope you do too, but one I like to read about... if for no other reason then to remind myself what I want to avoid.